In addition, avoiding confrontations and knowing how to handle encounters with a wild animal is always preferable to using a firearm. The Taurus Tracker series is a rugged family of revolvers designed specifically for wilderness survival.
While some might say that .357 Magnum is on the lower end of what they would want in their hands against a bear or even an aggressive moose, a well-placed shot would bring down even the largest of bruins. An advantage of the .357 Magnum over more powerful rounds is that it generally is easier to handle and fire accurately, not to mention that revolver chambered in the caliber are also usually lighter.
Large, unwieldy, and often hard to shoot accurately, the .44 Magnum is nonetheless a great round for predator defense. Ruler’s revolvers are made from high-grade steel and constructed to handle extra stress, making them popular with hand loaders using hot rounds.
Both the Red hawk and Black hawk series have been used successfully in the wild, and perhaps most famously by legendary explorer Sir Ralph Fences when he drew one of the magnum revolvers against charging polar bear and shot it in the foot in the North Pole. The prevailing opinion is that if you fire this hand cannon at something and don’t miss by a mile, that thing will die.
They are made of flesh, blood, and large vital organs that, if punctured, will usually result in death. If you’re okay with carrying around a 56-ounce to 82-ounce revolver on your hip, you can rest easy in the fact that you’re basically lugging around a cannon.
It should also be noted that the S&W 500 has been used to successfully take cape buffalo, one of the toughest animals in the world and often reputed as the biggest challenge for hunters in Africa. Top 3 Weapons for Wilderness Survival Skip to content Disclosure: When you buy through links on our site we may earn a commission.
One of the main reasons that people don’t go into the wilderness is because they are too afraid of things like getting eaten by a bear. Most of these fears are completely irrational and, statistically, you are a lot safer in the wilderness than in a big city.
My neighbors are constantly saying that they won’t go into the wild because there might be thieves, rapists, murderers, jail escapees, or other creepy weirdos lurking about. In a SHF situation where you’ve got to Bug Out in the wilderness, then I’d definitely want a weapon against starving masses of people you might encounter.
But, in general, the wilderness is a lot safer than the city in terms of crime rates. Consider that the Appalachian Trail has over 4 million users yearly, and you start to realize how much safer the wilderness is than cities.
Los Angeles has a population of about 4 million and has about 250 homicides yearly ! Most people do not die in the wild from bear attacks (there were only 5 fatal cases in all the 2000s), or even from snake bites.
Most people die because they overestimate their abilities, push their limits too far, or are just straight-up unprepared. In my experienced opinion, this is the absolute best weapon for survival in the wilderness.
Pepper spray is also very lightweight and can be carried on the side of your pack, so it is easily accessible. Bear spray is also effective against most other dangerous wild animals, and against people too.
But there are a lot of practical reasons why a gun is at the bottom of this list of wilderness weapons: When every ounce matters, I don’t have room in my pack for a gun.
We spend a lot of time and effort here at Rancho De Los Locos gathering preps in the form of storage food, medical and first aid supplies, alternative lighting, heating, energy, and water sources. We spend even more time and energy in creating a sustainable lifestyle, one that we hope will carry us through years if needs be, well beyond our ability to stockpile goods.
And so, I have devoted a fair amount of thought, learned a good collection of skills, and gathered a decent kit of needed gear. One of the things I have had to contend with is that it is just flat out impossible to carry enough ammo to feed a battle rifle through multiple sustained fire fights.
I encounter so many survivalists that have this Rambo/Mad Max fantasy about how an HTF scenario will play out. They are all about the tactical gear, high cap Semi Automatics (rifle and handgun), and pretty much anything that comes in cameo and feeds that fantasy.
In reality, it is more likely that back woods survival will have a lot more to do with being able to feed yourself than your ability to fight off hundreds of zombies (or brigands, or looters, or wayward ANTIFA types, or the bogeymen of your choice). However, with good shot placement it can be an adequate deer cartridge, and with a .22 LR conversion kit it is great for rabbits and squirrels.
If you intend to use this as a versatile survival rifle, the .22 conversion kit is highly recommended, it will make it easier to carry a larger quantity of ammo, and open the door for acquiring a wider variety of fresh meat. Above Photo: My Girlfriend and I keep these His N Her assortment of Personal Weapons on hand for a “Zombie Apocalypse”.
I favor Pump Guns, and lean towards Moss berg 500s and their illegitimate cousin the Maverick 88s. There are a lot of other good options, including the Remington 870s, and a fair selection of quality Semiautomatics as well.
It comes down to a matter of preference and personal taste, and I have been shooting Moss bergs for 40 some years. So I’ll suffice it to say that I prefer large steel framed pistols, and my full size handgun of choice is the M9 pattern (Including both the Beretta and Taurus 92s).
I like 9 mm, it’s an adequate man stopper and I can carry a bit more ammo for the size and weight than .45 or .40, but all three of those calibers are good choices and abundantly available. Once again, it is my opinion that surviving in the woods is more about putting food on the campfire than it is about shoot-outs with roving bands of desperadoes.
The absolute best defense against all manner of dubious people is avoidance, escape, and evasion. While your gun fighting skills should not be overlooked, your ability to avoid or break contact is far more useful in keeping you alive.
I’m not going to be spending a lot of time stopping to preserve meat, so I’m not going to be all that interested in large game. The best thing about the .22 is that bringing a thousand rounds of ammo is cost, bulk, and weight effective.
This is an ammo supply an order of magnitude greater than with the AR, AK, or shotgun, and you can keep a year’s worth of small game in a pocket. If your primary objective is to break contact and escape, a few rounds of .22 properly placed can buy you the time you need to set that in motion.
As I side note, every time someone tells me a .22 won’t even injure an assailant, I ask them if they would mind standing in front of the woodpile while I shoot them. It’s that preference and habit thing again, this is another gun I have used for 4 plus decades, it has fed me and entertained me, and trained my kids.
If you prefer double action, the Ruler Red hawk, and the Smith and Wesson Model 29 are just two of the many fine options available. Pretty much the ultimate in small game getting, fowl getting, and with slugs even deer getting weapon.
This is versatility at its best, and in a survival situation it gives you a greatly increased chance of coming across ammo you can use without carrying a bunch of guns. This range of Calibers and gauges also allows you to hunt just about anything you would want to, provides several good defensive round options, and is even effective on big grumpy bears.
This one is going in my girlfriend’s GHB, since she works 3 hrs away (by truck, a lot longer on foot or horseback! I believe that combo guns of this type are a great choice in The Best Firearms to Survive in the Woods debate.
There are a number of rifles on the Market that offer changeable barrels, as well as the tried and true Thompson Contender Handguns. Take into account what your objectives will be, the duration you may have to survive, the threats you perceive, and the game you intend to eat.